[Filesystems-devel] Bug#793863: Add new package f2fs-tools-dev for external development use
殷啟聰
seamlikok at gmail.com
Thu Jul 30 12:05:42 UTC 2015
Hi Cheng,
Thanks for your reply. I am patching it to use existing Autotools
mechanism to compile the libraries, but I have some questions.
First, shall we add two new packages for libf2fs.so and
libf2fs_format.so respectively, or shall we add only one new package
named "f2fs-libs" to contain all libraries produced by this project? I
can't decide because the original upstream author never meant to
produce a libf2fs_format.so, which is simply a dynamic library version
of mkfs.f2fs.
Second, If we are making two packages for two libraries, why not name
them like "libf2fs1" instead of "libf2fs0"? The produced .so files are
versioned 0.0.0 because the author did not configure for the version
number, so Libtool simply uses the default one. When installing the
.so files and the symlinks, we can use dh-exec to substitute the
version number.
Cheers,
Kai-Chung Yan
2015-07-29 7:16 GMT+08:00 Vincent Cheng <vcheng at debian.org>:
> Control: tag -1 - patch + newcomer
>
> Hi Kai-Chung,
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 2:51 AM, 殷啟聰 <seamlikok at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Source: f2fs-tools
>> Version: 1.4.1-1
>> Severity: wishlist
>> Tags: patch
>> X-Debbugs-CC: komaldsukhani at gmail.com,hans at at.or.at,apo at gambaru.de,android-tools-devel at lists.alioth.debian.org
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am packaging Android SDK which requires a libf2fs_fmt.so compiled
>> from libf2fs.c, f2fs_format.c and f2fs_format_utils.c. Android SDK
>> also needs the headers of f2fs-tools. More information can be found at
>> <https://android.googlesource.com/platform/external/f2fs-tools/+/master/Android.mk>.
>> Currently f2fs-tools package does not provide these files for external
>> development use, so I wish to add a new package "f2fs-tools-dev"
>> containing some development files. I have made a patch for the
>> modifications.
>>
>> This patch creates a new package "f2fs-tools-dev" and a
>> f2fs-tools-dev.mk that compiles the source files mentioned above into
>> 2 .a files. The package installs this 2 .a files and the headers.
>> Please consider using it, thank you.
>
> Thanks for the patch! However, there are a few issues with it that
> should be fixed before I'd consider uploading it:
>
> - Debian Policy 8.4 [1] dictates that header files and static libs
> should be installed in a binary package named libfoo-dev, not
> "f2fs-tools-dev" (I'd suggest libf2fs-dev here). At the same time I
> suggest splitting out the shared library currently installed in
> f2fs-tools into its own package, e.g. libf2fs0.
> - Both libf2fs-dev and libf2fs0 should be multiarch-ified by
> installing files into the appropriate multiarch paths and including
> the appropriate multiarch fields in d/control. You can refer to this
> guide to help you MA-ify a package. [2]
> - Instead of adding a makefile, please integrate your changes into the
> autotools setup that f2fs-tools currently uses.
>
> Regards,
> Vincent
>
> [1] https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-sharedlibs.html
> [2] https://wiki.debian.org/Multiarch/Implementation
--
/*
* 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan
* 一生只向真理與妻子低頭
* Full-time student of National Taichung University of Education
* LinkedIn: <https://linkedin.com/in/seamlik>
* Blog: <seamlik.logdown.com>
*/
More information about the Filesystems-devel
mailing list