[Filesystems-devel] Bug#955549: [f2fs-dev] Bug#955549: f2fs-tools: fsck.f2fs segfaults
Chao Yu
yuchao0 at huawei.com
Fri Apr 3 07:37:09 BST 2020
Thanks for forwarding, Ted.
On 2020/4/3 10:45, Adam Borowski wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 03:16:58PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 02:01:26PM +0200, Adam Borowski wrote:
>>>
>>> After a lot of output on a damaged filesystem (SD card copied to an image)
>>> fsck.f2fs dies with:
>>>
>>> - File name : mkfs.ext3.dpkg-new
>>> - File size : 6 (bytes)
>>>
>>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>> 0x00005555555593ec in memcpy (__len=18446744073323892736, __src=0x55555560760c, __dest=0x7fffffffe000) at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string_fortified.h:34
>>> 34 return __builtin___memcpy_chk (__dest, __src, __len, __bos0 (__dest));
>
>>> #0 0x00005555555593ec in memcpy (__len=18446744073323892736, __src=0x55555560760c, __dest=0x7fffffffe000) at /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/string_fortified.h:34
At a glance, immediate reason of this issue is we didn't check inode.i_namelen's
validation.
>>> #1 convert_encrypted_name (name=name at entry=0x55555560760c " ", len=-385658880, new=new at entry=0x7fffffffe000 " ", enc_name=<optimized out>) at fsck.c:1132
>>> #2 0x0000555555562286 in print_inode_info (sbi=0x55555557db20 <gfsck>, node=0x5555556075b0, name=1) at mount.c:183
>>> #3 0x0000555555562a46 in print_node_info (sbi=<optimized out>, node_block=<optimized out>, verbose=<optimized out>) at mount.c:277
>>> #4 0x0000555555560d3f in dump_node (sbi=sbi at entry=0x55555557db20 <gfsck>, nid=nid at entry=24274, force=force at entry=1) at dump.c:520
>>> #5 0x000055555555e94c in fsck_verify (sbi=0x55555557db20 <gfsck>) at fsck.c:2568
>>> #6 0x000055555555699b in do_fsck (sbi=0x55555557db20 <gfsck>) at main.c:569
>
>>> I have a copy of the filesystem in question from before any repair attempts.
>>> It has no sensitive data on it, thus I can share if needed -- 14GB.
>>
>> Thanks for the bug report. Can you make the file system image
>> available somehow? Maybe for download at some URL? How well does it
>> compress?
>
> 916MB -- https://angband.pl/rigel.f2fs.xz.gpg
> The machine serves as a serial console logger/management for a bunch of
> boxes; a root session is unlikely to have anything I'd not share with
> developers but is not something to release to the wide world. Thus, I
> symetrically encrypted the image, I'll send you the password privately --
> feel free to share it with anyone semi-trusted.
Would you mind sharing the password with me (chao at kernel.org)? I guess
I can take a look at this issue.
Thanks,
>
> The filesystem was on a SD card, with very light use (append), no issues,
> ran kernel 4.13 until 9 days ago -- then I've upgraded to 5.5.11 with no
> other changes. The corruption is probably caused by that, but there's
> always a chance of SD being SD.
>
>
> Meow!
>
More information about the Filesystems-devel
mailing list