[Freedombox-discuss] Why is this list so quiet?
Andrew Schaaf
andrew at andrewschaaf.com
Wed Feb 16 23:11:00 UTC 2011
On Feb 16, 2011, at 4:55 PM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
>>
>>
> I personally find it wrong to extend Freedombox to be the platform for _writing_ code - there is plenty of challenge already in shrinkwrapping readily available and already Debian-packaged code, and I fear we loose sight if take our mouth too full.
I think the apps should...
...never ever ever store data using anything other than abstract NoSQL connections.
...make it as easy as possible for a dev from the startup world to dive in.
...have awesome UX.
...be developed on GitHub (until we create a superior replacement :)
I think the top short-term goal is to make some progress and become as attractive a project as possible to startup-world web developers' spare time.
I think we'll be much better off in a year if we've written a coherent set of modern, readable, NoSQL apps.
> What development are you talking about? CoffeeScript only, anything FreedomBox (whatever that
> means), anything Debian, or anything Free?
Anything that leads to FB progress! (Apps, tools, distros...)
I'll be using NodeJS/Coffee/C, but others might not.
You're right, a Debian list probably isn't the place to discuss development.
But it's the only known place so far for joining forces with other FB enthusiasts.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20110216/e2f5d3f3/attachment.htm>
More information about the Freedombox-discuss
mailing list