[Freedombox-discuss] We do need mesh networking

Michael Blizek michi1 at michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com
Sat Feb 19 18:49:22 UTC 2011


Hi!

On 18:59 Sat 19 Feb     , Luca Dionisi wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Jonathan Roberts
> <jonrob.one at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > On this topic...
> >
> > from what I've seen of previous discussions, some people are very
> > knowledgeable about mesh networking so this may not be of
> > news/interest, but I'm pretty sure the OLPCs have mesh capabilities.
> > They might be good people to talk to about protocols/techniques, and
> > their software for it is almost certainly open source.
> 
> Their mesh capabilities are those of standard 802.11s. They use AODV.
> For what I know they should have a big limitation in the number of
> nodes they can scale up to.
> As well as other open issues (the protocol being reactive, the IP has
> to be chosen by the user and has to be unique, etc)
> 
> Not very reliable for a big mesh.

I have not seen *any* ready-to-use of meshing so far that is very scaleable.
In order to scale, you basically have to limit the depth of routes you
discover and the length of routes you take. Otherwise in average, everybody
needs to forward more data compared to the amount of data end nodes can
send/receive.

How do you intend to do this in netsukuku?

	-Michi
-- 
programing a layer 3+4 network protocol for mesh networks
see http://michaelblizek.twilightparadox.com




More information about the Freedombox-discuss mailing list