[Freedombox-discuss] Rouge Freedomboxes and government intervention

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On 11-06-21 at 08:44pm, Charles N Wyble wrote:
> On 06/21/2011 03:33 PM, Sébastien Lerique wrote:
> > On 21/06/11 16:37, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: For what it's worth, I 
> > agree 100% with this. "Consumer" is indeed a sensitive/loaded word 
> > (and yes the GNU explanation make its point in saying that one's 
> > activity on Internet is not only "consuming"), but I think it fits 
> > well as a label for that "harmless FreedomBox" usage.
> 
> 
> How about "everyday casual user" instead of consumer?

Sounds fine to me.

I wanted to get a message across about short-term stable releases vs. 
advanced use cases, and am not stubborn about the name of the labels.


 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20110622/3deff43f/attachment-0001.pgp>