[Freedombox-discuss] FOAF developers taking FreedomBox into their equation

[Henry Story]

On 10 Mar 2011, at 02:55, bertagaz at ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 12:11:01AM +0100, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
>> On 10 March 2011 00:02, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:29:06PM +0000, Clint Adams wrote:
>> Traditionally we've always 'self signed' our WebID certificates.  So
>> there's no CA that needs to be in the loop.  In fact, I dont know of
>> any instance WebID has *ever* been used with a CA, but I suppose it is
>> possible too. :)
> 
> Then how does the authentification part works? Is there a web of trust, or
> a way to be sure a X.509 cert belongs to a certain ID?

The wiki contains a lot of initial answers.

http://www.w3.org/wiki/Foaf%2Bssl/FAQ#How_does_Secure_Authentication_Work_with_FOAF.2BSSL.3F




> 
> bert.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/