[Freedombox-discuss] fully-decentralised forums
thomas at thomasruddy.org
Wed Sep 14 09:14:46 UTC 2011
Someone below known as DrBob or Mark,
>Which other systems provide fully-decentralised forums?
"Decentralised can imply "distributed" or "federated". A list of applications that have support, or plan to implement support, for federation (interoperability) are distinguished from distributed ones here,
Thomas Ruddy, Switzerland, Privacy in E-Governance http://www.thomasruddy.eu
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:07:12 +0100
From: drbob <drbob at lunamutt.com>
To: freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Is FreedomBox interested in using
Message-ID: <D430B796-BBA3-426E-A976-1CF01628E837 at lunamutt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
I thought the point of freedombox was to provide privacy and control of your data?
This is exactly what Retroshare tries to do - in a fully decentralised manner ;)
I'd rather not just focus on file-sharing features either...
Which other systems provide fully-decentralised forums?
Marc, if you are interested in anonymity... Retroshare provides strong anonymity.
Certainly better than bittorrent or other file-sharing networks like Mute.
The key is to build a trusted link-level network on which the file-sharing can take place.
We use the "Turtle" protocol - developed by Tanenbaum's group from the Vrije University.
Here is a link to an academic paper describing the "Strong Anonymity" features of Turtle:
and the wikipedia page on Turtle:
More information about the Freedombox-discuss