[Freedombox-discuss] T-shirts
Robert Martinez
mail at mray.de
Fri Dec 7 14:21:30 UTC 2012
There should be no problem for you to open any pdf with free software:
http://pdfreaders.org/
LibreOffice can export to pdf but cannot use it as project source file
(PDF isn't supposed to be used as that)
The reasons for using PDF are that it is *one* file with predictable
outcome on screen and paper (unlike HTML). But I agree an additional
HTML version would come in handy.
Robert
On 07/12/12 15:12, Rick wrote:
> I downloaded the FreedomBox Identity Manual.
>
> Open Office doesn't do very well with it. Is there a version that one
> can view with software that runs on Linux?
>
> HTML would be a better all around format. I don't understand why
> people format documentation as pdf and link it from a website. It's
> so much more useful when it is browsable.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Robert Martinez <mail at mray.de
> <mailto:mail at mray.de>> wrote:
>
>
> On 07/12/12 14:08, Markus Sabadello wrote:
> > BTW, is either one of the two the "official" or "preferred" one? I
> > think at one point you referred to them as the box-hopping-gnu
> and the
> > butterfly-gnu :) Then there's also the one
> > at http://freedomboxfoundation.org/
>
> There is one official logo: the butterfly.
> http://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/VisualIdentity?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=FreedomBox-Logo.7z
> Please do use that one all the time.
> Having just one logo isn't just copying big corporations bad karma
> - it
> is critical to the success of any project that relies on public
> recognition.
>
> > Also, any update on the licensing question that came up a while ago,
> > or is that still kind of unclear?
>
> I like the idea of dual licencing: GPL3+ to be able to release it with
> code and CC-BY-SA to let everybody print & use it.
> I'll clarify that in a seperate mail to the list to give the project
> lead opportunity to react.
>
> >
> > For example, would anything be wrong with using a modified
> version of
> > one of the logos for a local FreedomBox community, e.g. see
> > here? https://metalab.at/wiki/FreedomBox
> >
> > Markus
>
> Not at all, there is a guideline that you could have a look at first:
> http://wiki.debian.org/FreedomBox/VisualIdentity?action=AttachFile&do=view&target=FreedomBox-Identity-Manual.pdf
> Mentioning this makes me really sad since we even have a logo for the
> foundation and an finished website design that just won't go
> online. :(
>
>
> Robert
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> <mailto:Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
>
>
>
>
> --
> "It's hard to believe that something which is neither seen nor
> felt can do so much harm."
> "That's true. But an idea can't be seen or felt. And that's what
> kept the Troglytes in the
> mines all these centuries. A mistaken idea."
> -- Vanna and Kirk, "The Cloud Minders", stardate 5819.0
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20121207/aa491dc3/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Freedombox-discuss
mailing list