[Freedombox-discuss] mesh network [was: FreedomBox Testing 2012.0617 Image Published]

Markus Sabadello markus.sabadello at gmail.com
Mon Jun 18 12:41:39 UTC 2012


Just wanted to comment that a few people here in Vienna have been
discussing
trying to hook up the FreedomBox with the local mesh network (FunkFeuer,
OLSR-based).

When we get something interesting working, we'll let you know..

all the best,
Markus
-- 
Project Danube: http://projectdanube.org
Personal Data Ecosystem Consortium: http://personaldataecosystem.org/

On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Yan Hetges <yan at exalot.com> wrote:

> Hello
>
> first of all, i'd like to quickly introduce myself. My name is Yan, i
> like freedom and have been using Debian as my main desktop OS since woody
> and been playing with it on servers since the same time. I've also been
> actively deploying a wifi adhoc mesh network with OpenWrt and derivates
> since 2006 (it has ~15 nodes and covers an area of maybe 15 km^2).
> And i've been reading this list since late January...
>
> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 10:03:49PM -0400, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > Hmmm...  So, the Freedombox needs to use external infrastructure such as
> an ethernet or WiFi router?
>
> yes, freedombox wants to use the internet
> >
> > I was thinking WiFi would connect all neighbors together on a WiFi mesh
> able to simultaneously transmit / receive to other Freedomboxes directly
> without a hub / router. Sort of an ad hoc Internet.
>
> it could theoretically connect all neighbours together and NOT
> simultaneously tx/rx because the wifi radio can only either or, not both
> at the same time. And that's the main issue, usable bandwidth gets less
> at each hop.
> >
> > Is such a thing possible with WiFi?
>
> to a certain degree, and it might never be able to replace an
> infrastructure! Also, to connect neighbours without internet, they want
> to be pretty close to each other... like one in every appartment! That
> will then make so much noise that there might be no communication
> possible over more than 2-4 hops. Please don't understand me wrong, i
> LOVE the idea! Also, to make that work out of the box, without external
> antennas mounted on a roof, or the FBX mounted in a weatherproof box on
> top of a bamboo pole in a tall tree or something like that, is very
> unlikely. I suggest reading RFC 1925 [1] espexially (5),(8) and (10).
> If you really want to integrate a self employing mesh function into
> FBX i'd recommend looking deeply into what R.O.B.I.N. [2] does.
> Also, it would be very much appreciated and make group communication
> much easier if you (some of you) would consider reading and following
> [3] , especially 9. And/or RFC 1855 [4].
> Thank you everyone so much for all your work!
>
>  cheers
>
>    --Yan
>
> [1]http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1925.txt
> [2]http://wiki-robin.meshroot.com/
> [3]http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php
> [4]http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1855.txt
>
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk/eyG8ACgkQlTtvZdk47D7DJACfdpqhaAxTXNyFO9V+2VqVkPWc
> uwYAnR26OuiXS0do6rFlOEmRkftCyRlj
> =8iX8
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freedombox-discuss mailing list
> Freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20120618/427dc4c0/attachment.html>


More information about the Freedombox-discuss mailing list