[Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBox Unstable Image 2013.0405 Available
Nick Hardiman
nick at internetmachines.co.uk
Thu Apr 11 12:28:57 UTC 2013
Had a quick check. The bittorrent daemon thinks it's missing one tiny chunk, but otherwise it's all there.
nick at admin:~$ transmission-remote localhost:8080 --auth user:pass -l
ID Done Have ETA Up Down Ratio Status Name
1 100% 298.0 MiB Done 0.0 0.0 15.9 Idle pmagic_2013_01_29.iso
6 100% 1.3 GiB Done 0.0 0.0 5.96 Idle freedombox-unstable_2013.0219
7 100% 325.7 MiB Done 0.0 0.0 3.00 Idle freedombox-unstable_2013.0130
11 100% 2.5 GiB Done 0.0 0.0 12.3 Idle freedombox-unstable_2013.0318
12 99% 957.8 MiB Unknown 0.0 0.0 2.37 Idle freedombox-unstable_2013.0405
Sum: 5.4 GiB 0.0 0.0
nick at admin:~$
I would run
make weekly-image
and see what happens, but I have just moved house and most of my IT things are in cardboard boxes. :)
Nick Hardiman
nick at internetmachines.co.uk
@intmachines
On 11 Apr 2013, at 13:15, "Nick M. Daly" <nick.m.daly at gmail.com> wrote:
> Nick Hardiman <nick at internetmachines.co.uk> writes:
>
>> Looks a bit broken. There are three suspiciously small files.
>
> Let me know when you've mirrored them and I'll try to boot it off my
> DP. As I mentioned on IRC, never code while tired: I munged the
> repository into a weird state (pulling vmdebootstrap into the root
> instead of vendor directory), branched my changes off into a separate
> repository, and deleted the separate repository before all the changes
> landed in the original (published) repository again. So far, I've seen
> one changeset that didn't make it back (naming the VirtualBox image
> correctly), but there are probably others.
>
> I've also fixed the weekly-directory building bugs in the latest
> commit. I'd appreciate if anyone could let me know their experiences
> with building this thing.
>
> Nick
More information about the Freedombox-discuss
mailing list