[Freedombox-discuss] Which mesh system should be included in the Freedombox?
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Sat Oct 12 09:55:32 UTC 2013
Quoting Petter Reinholdtsen (2013-10-12 09:36:15)
> [Sandy Harris]
>> As I see it, security has to be the first consideration for any Box
>> component, including a mesh system. Given the stated project goals we
>> should not even consider anything unless we have good reason to
>> consider it secure.
>
> Well, I believe that is putting the cart in front of the horse, given
> the current amount of people involved. I believe we first need to get
> something useful that can be located in the privacy of the users homes
> to get that legal protection, and then we can continue improving that
> to make it more and more "secure", which is a word that mean different
> things to different people and thus hard to have as a fuzzy goal.
>
> This mean to me that we pick solutions already in common use and
> integrate it into the Freedombox, and depend on the rest of the free
> software community to audit it (with our help, if someone in the
> Freedombox want to spend time on it).
I perfectly agree with *both* of you above - except your very first
sentence, Petter:
a) First consideration should be security
b) First features added should be useful and in common use
Since I am not experienced with using Debian for mesh networking, and
apparently others on this list isn't either, I would look at _different_
features than mesh networking for now - while we try generate (or locate
existing) experiences and common practices of using mesh networking in
Debian more broadly, which we can _then_ include in FreedomBox.
> I've concluded I will focus on batman-adv for now, as it provide layer
> 2 mesh networking (as in both IPv4 and IPv6 will work) and is used by
> the Serval project that provide a peer-to-peer phone system that allow
> phone calls and "SMS" messaging without central infrastucture. If the
> freedombox provide mesh nodes compatible with the Serval project, we
> get free software phone support for free. :)
Great that you'll do more research into mesh networking. Sounds like a
sensible choice, from the facts you provide.
Looking forward to hear more from that research, so we can *then*
consider if sensible to include in FreedomBox.
- Jonas
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20131012/affe5361/attachment.sig>
More information about the Freedombox-discuss
mailing list