[Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox-discuss Digest, Vol 44, Issue 30
sean at webio.me
Fri Mar 28 20:26:41 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
There were a few plugs for Freedombox at the conference in general,
and Eben was also asked about it during his Q&A.
https://getlibre.org - Free your software!
https://foojbook.net - Free your social!
On 03/28/2014 03:31 PM,
freedombox-discuss-request at lists.alioth.debian.org wrote:
> Send Freedombox-discuss mailing list submissions to
> freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> freedombox-discuss-request at lists.alioth.debian.org
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> freedombox-discuss-owner at lists.alioth.debian.org
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
> specific than "Re: Contents of Freedombox-discuss digest..."
> Today's Topics:
> 1. Dev: Sending All Traffic Over Tor? (Nick Daly) 2. Re: Freedombox
> mentioned on keynote by Jacob Appelbaum at LibrePlanet 2014
> (Jonathan Wilkes) 3. Re: Freedombox mentioned on keynote by Jacob
> Appelbaum at LibrePlanet 2014 (Petter Reinholdtsen) 4. Re: Dev:
> Sending All Traffic Over Tor? (Nick Daly) 5. Re: Dev: Sending All
> Traffic Over Tor? (James Valleroy) 6. Re: Dev: Sending All Traffic
> Over Tor? (Anders Jackson)
> Message: 1 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 10:02:40 -0500 From: Nick Daly
> <nick.m.daly at gmail.com> To: freedombox list
> <freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org> Subject:
> [Freedombox-discuss] Dev: Sending All Traffic Over Tor?
> <CAM-YhhDbwo5FTGstK_-UQOCToHvkgjmy_htAe=s7859mmTWS_Q at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Hi folks, since we now support running Tor bridges on boxes, is it
> time to send all the box's traffic over Tor?
> If so, what would be the best way to do this? We already have
> privoxy (have we configured it or the HTTPSEverywhere ruleset at
> all?), but we could also use one of the instruction sets from:
> Previously, there was one objection to this proposal:
> 1. Certain service providers discriminate against Tor users
> (editing Wikipedia without hoops, etc).
> So, are we significantly disadvantaging users by transparently
> proxying all their traffic over Tor? Of course, it depends on
> what they want to do, but are those discriminatory services
> sufficiently frequent to make gaining anonymity a net loss for the
> user? I don't think so but I haven't, for example, tried banking
> over Tor.
> Thanks, Nick
> Message: 2 Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 08:07:10 -0700 (PDT) From:
> Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika at yahoo.com> To: Petter Reinholdtsen
> <pere at hungry.com>, "freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org"
> <freedombox-discuss at lists.alioth.debian.org> Subject: Re:
> [Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox mentioned on keynote by Jacob
> Appelbaum at LibrePlanet 2014 Message-ID:
> <1396019230.90344.YahooMailNeo at web161201.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> I watched that and don't remember him talking about using a
> Freedombox.? What did he say he uses it for?
> He did talk about and show his Lenovo X60.? Gluglug sells a
> refurbished model of it that boots with coreboot and has a wifi
> card that operates using free software.
> On Friday, March 28, 2014 4:58 AM, Petter Reinholdtsen
> <pere at hungry.com> wrote:
> Check out <URL:
> >. Jacob Appelbaum mention the FreedomBox at LibrePlanet 2014.? And
> a bunch of interesting tools we probably should check out.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Freedombox-discuss