[Freedombox-discuss] FreedomBox - "Danube Edition"
dr at jones.dk
Wed Oct 22 10:32:18 UTC 2014
Quoting Markus Sabadello (2014-10-22 02:31:15)
> On 10/22/2014 02:06 AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Quoting Markus Sabadello (2014-10-22 01:29:15)
>>> So the message would basically be "you can get one, you can try to
>>> use it and learn about it, but don't rely on it".
>>> I noticed you just discussed how FreedomBox was not ready for the
>>> next Debian stable, but I think some people who don't know the
>>> command line would still want one.
>> You think some people who don't know the command line would want to
>> buy hardware to learn about it but not rely on it?
>> I think some people buy it but ignore the "but not rely on it" part -
>> because after playing with it (i.e. clicked on the web interface -
>> they don't know the command line) they conclude that if feels
>> reliable enough despite the warnings.
>> I think it is a bad idea to sell something that is not yet ready, to
>> someone who don't understand what that means: We are all so very used
>> to reading and ignoring disclaimers.
> Thanks Jonas, I had the same thoughts and am also worried about the same
> Following your argument, I believe people outside the command line /
> hacker / developer communities could never use any security or privacy
> related tools, because they will never be 100% ready.
How do you measure "percentage of ready"?!?
Debian "release when reasy" and have a track record of reaching that
point multiple times. But perhaps your "Danube Edition" has different
concept of "reeady" than Debian?
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 949 bytes
More information about the Freedombox-discuss