[Freedombox-discuss] Intel Compute Stick

Jonas Smedegaard dr at jones.dk
Wed Jan 14 12:17:31 UTC 2015

Hi Walter,

Quoting Walter van Holst (2015-01-14 12:03:02)
> On 2015-01-14 10:36, Jens Thiele wrote:
>> Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> writes:
>>> We could add a requirement that the board must be Open Hardware.  
>>> That would leave us with 12 options from 3 vendors.
>> +1 for this one
> What is the take of the Freedom Box project on the boundary problem in 
> open hardware? Especially the lower boundary? At what lower level 
> would such a requirement stop being applied?

Interesting question.  Seems you are knowledgeable in that area (which I 
am not) - what is your own opinion?

 - Jonas

P.S.  If you seek an authoritative answer from the formal US "FreedomBox 
Foundation" tapping onto community-driven work done here, then I 
recommend you to ask at info at freedomboxfoundation.org instead.

 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20150114/17d6833e/attachment.sig>

More information about the Freedombox-discuss mailing list