[Freedombox-discuss] Intel Compute Stick
Jonas Smedegaard
dr at jones.dk
Wed Jan 14 12:17:31 UTC 2015
Hi Walter,
Quoting Walter van Holst (2015-01-14 12:03:02)
> On 2015-01-14 10:36, Jens Thiele wrote:
>> Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> writes:
>>
>>> We could add a requirement that the board must be Open Hardware.
>>> That would leave us with 12 options from 3 vendors.
>>
>> +1 for this one
>
>
> What is the take of the Freedom Box project on the boundary problem in
> open hardware? Especially the lower boundary? At what lower level
> would such a requirement stop being applied?
Interesting question. Seems you are knowledgeable in that area (which I
am not) - what is your own opinion?
- Jonas
P.S. If you seek an authoritative answer from the formal US "FreedomBox
Foundation" tapping onto community-driven work done here, then I
recommend you to ask at info at freedomboxfoundation.org instead.
--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 949 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/freedombox-discuss/attachments/20150114/17d6833e/attachment.sig>
More information about the Freedombox-discuss
mailing list