[Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox on a free operating system
Sandy Harris
sandyinchina at gmail.com
Tue Jan 31 07:56:04 GMT 2023
On Sat, Dec 10, 2022 at 8:54 AM Esteban Ordóñez <quiliro at riseup.net> wrote:
> Yes. That is why Debian has been nonfree. Debian used to say that it
> was free because its main repository had all free software. Now Debian
> is in fact nonfree, even by its own definitions.
> ...
> The only thing that is important is that the truth be told. This double
> talk makes people think that Debian is freedom. It is not. ...
>
> So it is an important issue for Freedombox. Deciding to be based on
> Debian without nonfree software would mean not including the nonfree
> firmware. If the user decided to include it, that would be the user's
> decision. But that would not involve Freedombox's collaboration to
> subjugate the user. Telling people that they should opt for freedom
> does very little. Setting the example is the only way. Freedombox can
> do this.
Would Devuan be any better? I prefer it because it does not use
systemd, but do not know what it does about firmware.
https://www.devuan.org/
Is this mostly illusory anyway, since most systems come with
non-free firmware & some have other "features" that might
well be security holes?
More information about the Freedombox-discuss
mailing list