<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Dave Crossland <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:dave@lab6.com">dave@lab6.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I kindly suggest the work cycle would be:<br>
<br>
- rank each of the goals by impact<br>
- rank each of the goals by effort<br>
- pick the highest impact, lowest effort one<br></blockquote><div> - [the rest]</div><div><br></div><div>yes, i agree. i was just saying that everybody can do this for themselves, and from their own point of view. There doesn't have to be a centralized process for this, that centrally precedes everything else. Also, we don't have to agree on which goal is the highest impact, lowest effort one. Each person can "vote by example" by working on the goal that *they* think is the most important one, and the result will tend to optimality, while at the same time everybody will work on their preferred goal.</div>
</div>