<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
    On 07/22/2011 03:49 AM, John Walsh wrote:
    <blockquote cite="mid:A38B2B5744A04B51A6B9B4A376FD7A1E@SUZIE"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=ISO-8859-1">
      <meta content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.17098" name="GENERATOR">
      <div><font face="Arial" size="2"><span class="828293605-22072011">Hi
            Everybody,</span></font></div>
      <div><font face="Arial" size="2"><span class="828293605-22072011"></span></font> </div>
      <div><font face="Arial" size="2"><span class="828293605-22072011">There
            has been been a lot of heated and name calling on the
            mailing list recently;</span></font></div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Hmmm. I think it's the first great discussion to happen on this list
    with any real meaning. <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:A38B2B5744A04B51A6B9B4A376FD7A1E@SUZIE"
      type="cite"><font><span class="828293605-22072011"><span lang="EN">
            <div><span lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"><font face="Arial" size="2">I think this
                      is quite disappointing for a project with such
                      high aspirations, <br>
                    </font></span></span></span></div>
          </span></span></font></blockquote>
    <br>
    I think it's awesome. It brought out issues that needed to be
    discussed. <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:A38B2B5744A04B51A6B9B4A376FD7A1E@SUZIE"
      type="cite"><font><span class="828293605-22072011"><span lang="EN">
            <div><span lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"></span></span></span> </div>
            <div><span lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"><font face="Arial" size="2">I think the
                      name calling can be put down to "The Great
                      FreedomBox Conspiracy Theory". Basically, the
                      Great Philosopher promised people who gave him
                      money a FreedomBox full of "Debianised" toys from
                      the Packagers, which would do everything to
                      protect Freedom Fighters except mesh computing. Of
                      course, the mere mention of the toys "freedom and
                      privacy" drew donations from Philosophers and
                      Architectures who felt that after donating they
                      had a right to be heard at the Foundation. <br>
                    </font></span></span></span></div>
          </span></span></font></blockquote>
    <br>
    Yep. I still haven't seen a full accounting of where that money
    went, what it was used for, how much is left etc. <br>
    <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:A38B2B5744A04B51A6B9B4A376FD7A1E@SUZIE"
      type="cite"><font><span class="828293605-22072011"><span lang="EN">
            <div><span lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"></span></span></span> </div>
            <div><span lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"><font face="Arial" size="2">Next, the
                      "Is/Is Not" Manifest was published by
                      the Foundation which was so general the
                      Philosophers/Architects started talking about
                      their new toys. After a while one
                      of the Philosophers wondered were they just
                      talking amongst themselves, which caused the Great
                      Philosopher and his Packagers to issue the Great
                      Update and t</font></span></span></span><span
                lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"><font face="Arial" size="2">hen the
                      Working Group Proposal. Under the
                      Proposal, Architects could talk amongst themselves
                      in their "UI/UX" meeting room; Philosophers could
                      talk amongst themselves in the Peer to Peer Model
                      meeting room, while Packagers got their own
                      meeting rooms such a Networking Protocols and
                      Security Meeting Rooms. .</font></span></span></span></div>
          </span></span></font></blockquote>
    <br>
    In my opinion all this over built architecture to drive results is
    ridiculous. The announcement of the technical advisory committee led
    me to state "FreedomBox project is now dead". <br>
    <br>
    FreedomBox is starting to turn into Hurd. This is why I've thrown my
    effort behind Byzantium/FreedomNode cause we are actually moving
    towards release at high speed. <br>
    With no money, no high profile Free Software luminaries etc. <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:A38B2B5744A04B51A6B9B4A376FD7A1E@SUZIE"
      type="cite"><font><span class="828293605-22072011"><span lang="EN">
            <div><span lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"></span></span></span> </div>
            <div><span lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"><font face="Arial" size="2">However,
                      before the meeting rooms were built one
                      Philosopher demanded his new toy to be invented
                      now by the Packagers. The Packagers said it was
                      only their job to Debianise existing toys and not
                      create inventions thus revealing the Great
                      FreedomBox Conspiracy Theory.</font></span></span></span></div>
          </span></span></font></blockquote>
    <br>
    Mmhmm. <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:A38B2B5744A04B51A6B9B4A376FD7A1E@SUZIE"
      type="cite"><font><span class="828293605-22072011"><span lang="EN">
            <div><span lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"><font face="Arial" size="2">
                      The Architects realised that it's the Packagers
                      who choose the UI of the Debianised toys. The
                      Philosophers realised that it's the Packagers who
                      choose the Peer to Peer Model of the
                      Debianised toys. The Architects and
                      Philosophers felt their contributions were of no
                      value to the FreedomBox and they were only being
                      tolerated because of their donations. The
                      Packagers felt that they donate money and their
                      time to do all the work so they should choose
                      the UI and Peer to Peer Model for the Debianised
                      Toys of the FreedomBox. War broke out.</font></span></span></span></div>
          </span></span></font></blockquote>
    <br>
    Well said sir. <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:A38B2B5744A04B51A6B9B4A376FD7A1E@SUZIE"
      type="cite"><font><span class="828293605-22072011"><span lang="EN">
            <div><span lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"></span></span></span> <br>
            </div>
            <div><span lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"></span></span></span> </div>
            <div><span lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"><font face="Arial" size="2">I think the
                      Foundation needs to be honest with if/how
                      non-packagers can contribute to the project and I
                      think a good time to do that would be when the
                      FreedomBox Roadmap is released sometime after
                      the Debcon hacking fest. I will make a couple of
                      wiki posts to scratch an itch, but then I will
                      step back from the project until I see the
                      Roadmap.</font></span></span></span></div>
          </span></span></font></blockquote>
    <br>
    I don't see why a roadmap is even needed. Have fun with all the
    planning, architecture, working groups, etc. The 5 or so of us that
    actually build things should have something shipped in the very near
    future. More on this list soon (late next weekend or so should see a
    release). <br>
    <br>
    <blockquote cite="mid:A38B2B5744A04B51A6B9B4A376FD7A1E@SUZIE"
      type="cite"><font><span class="828293605-22072011"><span lang="EN">
            <div><span lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"></span></span></span> </div>
            <div><span lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"><font face="Arial" size="2">At the end of
                      the day, I will buy a FreedomBox because there
                      will be nothing better out there and I am happy if
                      that's my only genuine contribution. Please don't
                      just tolerate me because I donated to the project,
                      I would rather know now, if there is a genuine
                      opportunity to contribute my thoughts and ideas,
                      or if this is a mindless brainstorming session for
                      the likes of me without an actual outcome.</font></span></span></span></div>
            <div><span lang="EN"><span class="828293605-22072011"><span
                    lang="EN"></span></span></span><br>
            </div>
          </span></span></font></blockquote>
    <br>
    It does seem to be turning into a mindless brainstorming session
    indeed. <br>
    <br>
    FreedomBox is rapidly loosing releveancy in a world that moves at
    internet speed. Have fun being the next HURD. <br>
    <br>
    Ship or die folks. <br>
    <br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>