[Fsf-Debian] No response?
Bryan Baldwin
bryan at katofiad.co.nz
Mon Aug 6 03:31:14 UTC 2012
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/06/2012 02:52 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
> Can we now lay this allegation to rest? Who from the Debian project
> has refused ownership? Those sections, which are by definition
> outside Debian, are owned by the Debian project as stated in their
> founding documents.
I'm not saying that it isn't. I'm saying that it is bold-faced lying
no matter where it appears. The proposition is sophomoric, irrational,
and unrespectable. You are getting confused now. You seem to think
that proving that lies have been written down somewhere suddenly makes
them become true. You are free to believe that.
Taking ownership means stating plainly and publicly that contrib and
nonfree are part of Debian. Whether you mean the project, the system,
the distribution, or any other possible subdivisions and
classifications of "Debian" that you can think of.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQHzqCAAoJEM5s7GXJ0FEIK7IH/jJ/CYucv6dpYmvWxgp7d/JF
FMdjSFH6nIo6OMlavuYspF3dSDVbkUGxIRY0NcxuhmszTPqpPZ5JwmNvQtm+ZFnq
ZVZhz/UfmQLKzldyCFGsIJHTy5QuOO+DSjvE2DU+yDRtHhskRcMfaRMym0S67Gdf
KeBisPcAHivxSff7xWfNuSy9GGBzyxkBiDA+5hVCAox4DggKtGp75CfjVb8MDYHc
IJaLD845GSDR9vhBKLM8m4GDKT0HvWFyV2lcEEtcc2FljJkfbCQL/Shxv75Ts1TA
PcniQiK2wfa4QgaZyaMtFdoGQyiD3Gge6+zhRDST6E5DdmkVrS0zyBwCXLWnEuI=
=305X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Fsf-collab-discuss
mailing list