[Fsf-Debian] No response?

Karl Goetz karl at kgoetz.id.au
Mon Aug 6 11:50:14 UTC 2012

On Mon,   6 Aug 2012, 20:48:40 EST, Bryan Baldwin <bryan at katofiad.co.nz> wrote:

> Hash: SHA1
> On 08/06/2012 07:49 PM, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 03:50:23AM +0000, Clint Adams wrote:
> > > Do you understand how a sane and honest person might disagree 
> > > with you given the preponderance of evidence?
> > 
> > I agree and this is one of the criticism we need to address. But 
> > saying, in reply to this, "see, we/you're lying" is not enough to 
> > actually solve the issue.
> You're right, it doesn't solve the issue, it supplies visibility of the
> issues.

Had a thought after sending the last email, sorry.

> > the *alternative* solution, but for the sake of searching from 
> > common ground, we need to be creative and explore all the various 
> > possibilities.)
> Colocation could be done in such a way that the free and nonfree
> packages aren't part of the same structure. Which is to say I

perhaps nonfree.debian.(org|net) could be used.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/fsf-collab-discuss/attachments/20120806/c3bec762/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the Fsf-collab-discuss mailing list