[Fsf-Debian] Non-free firmware question during install

[Andrei POPESCU]

On Ma, 07 aug 12, 18:12:40, Paul van der Vlis wrote:
> 
> But if we do not talk about nonfree firmware, we do not need to tell
> that we do not recommended it.

Why not?
 
> I think telling about nonfree.org would be wrong in the eyes of the FSF.
> For me, it would not be a problem.
 
I meant to point users to an easy to remember website that might contain 
something like www.debian.org/intro/free (too long to mention in that 
text). Assuming nonfree.org is created I think it's front page should 
contain something very similar to the text at w.d.o/intro/free.
 
> It is OK for me, but I would prefer a text without the word "non-free"
> in it.

Just pretending it doesn't exist won't make it go away.

Kind regards,
Andrei
-- 
Offtopic discussions among Debian users and developers:
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/d-community-offtopic
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/fsf-collab-discuss/attachments/20120807/ff48c6e6/attachment.pgp>