[Fsf-Debian] few arguments to FSF
mtjm at mtjm.eu
Sun Aug 12 15:49:14 UTC 2012
> I know that is true with the Apache 1.0 license. I don't know about any
> On 08/11/2012 11:39 PM, Adam Bolte wrote:
>> I think there is a license the DFSG
>> considers free but the FSF does not?
You most probably mean the original Artistic License (used by Perl in
dual license with GPL 1 or later) . The Apache 1.0 license is
free according to both FSF and DFSG .
There was some software in Lenny main under the original Artistic
License, I haven't found any in Squeeze checking for some packages
listed in the gNewSense Metad blacklist (some was relicensed to the
Clarified Artistic License).
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the Fsf-collab-discuss