[Fusioninventory-user] RES: XML not fully used

Mario Jorge de Sousa Freire mario.freire at camara.gov.br
Fri Jun 15 20:13:01 UTC 2012


I thought the fields were defined by Fusion and not by GLPI...
What do you mean by generic enough?

I think Asset Tag is well defined. OCS, for example, has a field to this information.
Some computers don't have, but I think this is not a problem (it occurs with other fields).

Sorry, but where I can register a feature request?


Mário Jorge de Sousa Freire
Analista de Informática Legislativa
Câmara dos Deputados
CENIN/CAINF/SEGES - (61) 3216-3763
mario.freire at camara.gov.br

-----Mensagem original-----
De: fusioninventory-user-bounces+mario.freire=camara.gov.br at lists.alioth.debian.org [mailto:fusioninventory-user-bounces+mario.freire=camara.gov.br at lists.alioth.debian.org] Em nome de Gonéri Le Bouder
Enviada em: sexta-feira, 15 de junho de 2012 16:16
Para: FusionInventory User discussion
Assunto: Re: [Fusioninventory-user] XML not fully used

2012/6/15 Mario Jorge de Sousa Freire <mario.freire at camara.gov.br>:
> Hi, David & friends!
> Why some information available in XML is not stored in any field (e.g.:
> Asset Tag)? Is this going to change in a future version?
Hi Mario,

In general, the question is more:
Where to store it in GLPI? If there is no field yet in GLPI, is it generic enough?
And if so, is there a feature request somewhere?

     Gonéri Le Bouder

Fusioninventory-user mailing list
Fusioninventory-user at lists.alioth.debian.org

More information about the Fusioninventory-user mailing list