About having Configure in the tree.

[John Femiani]

Sylvain said:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I'd like to add the result of:
> 
> aclocal
> autoheader
> automake --add-missing --no-force
> autoconf
> 
> to the tree. The reason for this is that "Configure" do not impose the
> user of the library to have the autotools suite to install it.
> Although I agree that the file "Configure" would be the biggest by far
> in the library, "Configure" has with minimum dependencies (shell, perl
> and pkgconfig, afaik).
> 
> I wanted to know if anyone has strong feeling against this too.
> 
> - Sylvain
> 

I work on windows (sorry) so I love it when libraries include the
results of configure and I don't have to hassle with the mingw ports of
it.  I am in favor of your decision. 

 -- John