A question for you all: size_t or unsigned int

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Paul Harris <paulharris at computer.org> [2008.11.13.1302 +0100]:
> that way, the same code will "scale up" from an 8 bit microcpu up
> to the 64 bit gorillas

Yes, so the question is whether we want/need this. Once you start to
serialise/archive/save kdtrees, you are making it unnecessarily
difficult. unsigned int should be enough for everybody, no? :)

(or maybe this should be a #define-able option?)

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
warning: dates in calendar are closer than they appear.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/libkdtree-devel/attachments/20081113/5acd0075/attachment.pgp