Hi,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/3/20 Willi Richert <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:w.richert@gmx.net">w.richert@gmx.net</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
One more thing: The current state of having one explicit template realization<br>
in the python/swig part annoys me a little bit. Some weeks ago there was a<br>
discussion on the ML about whether or not dynamically supporting the<br>
specification of the dimension and type. How is the status here, Paul? If you<br>
have decided against it, I will provide a python file that generates all the<br>
stuff for float, double and int for dim \in [1, .., 20]. That will ease the<br>
maintenance a lot. In the other case the situation for the python bindings<br>
will be much smoother. But the performance will maybe suffer. Can you shed<br>
some light on this decision, Paul?<br>
<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Its still on the list, but I haven't had the time to do anything on kdtree for a while now, so i'm just focusing pushing through bug fixes to ensure that the results are correct.<br><br>I would guess it'll be at least a month before I can do anything, unless I manage to find a small random window of time where I can attack that issue.<br>
<br>Would it be too much to ask if you write the python file that generates all the variants, and then we can do the dynamic version later? I don't know how much work that would involve, if its not too much then I would prefer if you set yourself up with a low-maintenance solution first.<br>
</div></div><br>cheers,<br>Paul<br><br>