netconf and RFC 4741

[martin f krafft]

Dear list,

when looking for a project name, I chose netconf because that
yielded only one other reference: the NETCONF configuration
protocol. I didn't see much conflict, and thought I'd be choosing
a working name anyway.

I just ended up glancing at RFC 4741 again
(http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4741) and am a little more uncertain.

Do you think there's a potential name clash going on? My netconf
won't implement NETCONF, but the two are seperate anyway, netconf is
about a single Linux system, NETCONF is about a network
infrastructure (think SNMP).

What do you think? Should we start looking for alternative names?

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
until lions have their historians,
tales of the hunt shall always glorify the hunter.
                                                    -- african proverb
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/netconf-devel/attachments/20070918/bc07796f/attachment.pgp