Request for comment: a new software to manage linux networking features

[namnd]

Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2008/2/20, namnd <namnd at fpt.com.vn>:
>   
>>  martin f krafft wrote:
>> I oppose the idea of relying on a daemon at the core, and I don't
>>  believe the "stateless" idea will won't, so I can not join the current
>>  netconf design.
>>     
> Imho you will require a daemon for handling stuff like wireless roaming.
> Do you even target wireless networking with your current design?
>   
My design is divided into 2 parts, the core does not run as a daemon, it 
hits and runs. The additional part is a non-blocking IO based daemon, 
which provides stuffs requiring a daemon.