multiple default routes

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Jörg Sommer <joerg at alea.gnuu.de> [2008.05.25.1309 +0200]:
> 1. Route all packages, you don't have another rule for, via 10.100.…
> 1. Route all packages, you don't have another rule for, via 10.11.…
> 
> Do you want load balancing?

No, it turns out that's what happens when ifupdown, using
/sbin/route, brings up two ifaces with default routes. ip route
won't, actually, it seems.

I think what I want netconf to do if you bring up an iface with
a default gateway if a default route already exists is to keep it in
mind and make it active if the iface providing the currently active
default route goes down.

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
until lions have their historians,
tales of the hunt shall always glorify the hunter.
                                                    -- african proverb
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/netconf-devel/attachments/20080526/a374e380/attachment.pgp