[Nut-upsdev] recent and planned changes
Arnaud Quette
aquette.dev at gmail.com
Mon Sep 19 19:47:06 UTC 2005
> ...
> I think it is a bad idea to implement such an option. I cannot see how
> to do it except as a hack.
>
> I think selecting a device based on the bus ID or bus serial number is
> a much better idea, so I'll continue working on that.
>
>
sure, a stable naming like physical path, bus id, ... would be ideal.
the deal is simply: we should be still able to distinguish 2 devices with
the same model/mfr and no serial. Index was simply to skip detected ups
until we reached Index. I've not studied much libusb 1.0, but it might have
a better bus/dev path notion than the current 0.1.
Arnaud
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20050919/e6230ac2/attachment.htm
More information about the Nut-upsdev
mailing list