[Nut-upsdev] about battery.date.*
Charlie Brady
charlieb-nut-upsdev at e-smith.com
Fri Jan 27 23:59:40 UTC 2006
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006, Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006, Arnaud Quette wrote:
>
> > I think the naming should be changed to propose both:
> > - battery.date.mfr: Battery manufacturing date
> > - battery.date.change: Battery change date
> >
> > Any comments?
>
> Seems reasonable. Or simply battery.mfr and battery.change to get a
> common naming. I'd prefer that to renaming the other variables to
> things like battery.ampere.charge and battery.seconds.runtime ...
"battery.mfr" doesn't imply a date or time to me.
Is the "mfr" contraction necessary?
--
Charlie
More information about the Nut-upsdev
mailing list