[Nut-upsdev] enumerating UPSes with upsc (was Re: [Nut-upsuser] SNMP/management front-ends)

Daniel O'Connor doconnor at gsoft.com.au
Tue Jan 2 23:04:24 CET 2007


On Wednesday 03 January 2007 07:35, Carlos Rodrigues wrote:
> I think a "-l" option sounds good, better than just "@hostname".
>
> As for "@hostname" listing all variables from all UPSes, I think
> "*@hostname" would be a better choice (and it could even be extended
> to support real pattern matching in the future, if the need arises).

How about both?

@hostname is fairly intuitive (for people who've used finger anyway ;) and 
doesn't preclude proper patten matching.

The problem with *@hostname is you have to escape the * which is a bit of a 
pain.

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20070103/2b1f848c/attachment.pgp


More information about the Nut-upsdev mailing list