[Nut-upsdev] Re: [nut-commits] svn commit r714 - in trunk: . server

[Arjen de Korte]

Peter Selinger wrote:

>> For me, the IPv6 patch seems to do what it needs to do, but it would be
>> really useful to try this out on a big endian machine too.
> Yes, but it is on little-endian machines where testing matters the
> most, because network byte order is always big-endian. I.e., on a
> big-endian machine, htonl() and ntohl() are no-ops.

In that case, we're fine, since both the IPv4 and IPv6 mapped IPv4
functions work as expected. I can't test IPv6 only, since I don't have
an IPv6 network available for testing.

Best regards, Arjen