[Nut-upsdev] Asking hard questions about the NUT architecture
hb-nut at bsws.de
Tue Jun 5 13:13:53 UTC 2007
* Eric S. Raymond <esr at thyrsus.com> [2007-05-30 06:24]:
> Ronald Reed <rreed at ops.sgp.arm.gov>:
> > Yes, they make noise. But when they are on the other side of the planet,
> > in a room where no one is going to hear it, what good does a little
> > beeping do?
> If they're on the other side of the planet, what good does a
> *notification* do? :-) It's not like you're going to be able to
> parachute someone in until well after the battery drains. If what you
> want is just remote is-it-alive monitoring, ping is your friend.
your assumptions are horribly off.
first, when a site is without power, I of course want to know that
before it goes down, just for the fact that then I know the reason why
it is not reachable. So instead of trying to find where the network
broke, I can send power people to the site. And I can do that well
before batteries drain - which gives at least half an hour lead.
And your assumption that I cannot get people within half an hour into
remote sites looking at the problem and hopefully fixing it is just
plain wrong in many cases.
> I'm not (just) being snarky. You seem to be kind of wobbling back
> and forth between use cases for UPS-controlled shutdown and
> remote alerts. I agree that both actually have use cases, but
> the cases for one don't support the other very well.
I, for one, don't care about UPS controlled shutdows.
I need the data points, to prevent downtime, or at least minimize it.
Henning Brauer, hb at bsws.de, henning at openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service ISP - Secure Hosting, Mail and DNS Services
Dedicated Servers, Rootservers, Application Hosting - Hamburg & Amsterdam
More information about the Nut-upsdev