[Nut-upsdev] [Nut-upsuser] Belkin F6C1100-UNV

[Peter Selinger]

Arjen de Korte wrote:
> 
> 
> > your patch (committed with lightening speed) differs in many respects
> > from what I was discussing below.
> 
> Ash on my head, I submitted this patch too eagerly (because I want it so
> badly). I think it is best to revert the changes, since the BuildBot also
> chokes on it.
> 
> Another thing to note is that in my opinion, the SVN version number need
> not be updated for everything that is submitted. If the dependencies for a
> given tool don't require that it is rebuild (because the sources are not
> touched by an update), I would even prefer that the SVN revision number
> for that particular executable doesn't change.

That is a good point. It may change, of course, but it doesn't have to.
I'm not sure what you say is possible though, because the revision
number is added at compile time, not link time. So if a tool's
dependencies change, it may be re-linked without all parts being
re-compiled. 

-- Peter