[Nut-upsdev] [nut-commits] svn commit r1846 - in trunk: . clients common drivers include man server

[Daniel O'Connor]

On Tue, 26 May 2009, Arjen de Korte wrote:
> It has been like this for years and we have never really needed to
> run both ends in debug mode when trying to diagnose what is going on
> (remember, so far we didn't have any time stamps at all). I
> understand what the objections may be, but I really doubt this will
> add anything useful (the recent logs didn't hint in that direction
> either).

<shrugs> seems silly to go to extra effort to generate relative time 
stamps (save when you start, gettod & subtract for each log) when you 
can trivially generate absolute ones which allow you to reference any 
other event on your system be it another NUT daemon or not.

What advantage do relative timestamps have?

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 188 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20090526/55137279/attachment.pgp>