[Nut-upsdev] Evolution of the driver.list file

[Arnaud Quette]

2009/10/20 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>:
> On Oct 20, 2009, at 9:09 AM, Arnaud Quette wrote:
>
>> Hi Charles,
>>
>> 2009/10/20 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Arnaud Quette <aquette.dev at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> - I've done a first pass, and commited a driver.list.in (above link),
>>>> up to date with the latest trunk. I've tried to be as objective as
>>>> possible, using the various information sources we have
>>>> (acknowledgements, protocols, driver header, ...) but you know I'm
>>>> biased.
>>>
>>> For the tripplite_usb models, I would say that in general a "1" is
>>> fair, but since I regularly test against an OMNIVS1000, we should bump
>>> that up to "2".
>>
>> just to be sure: do you mean bumping to "2" only for the OMNIVS1000
>> entry and leaving to others to "1"?
>
> Yes, thanks.

done, thanks.

cheers,
Arnaud
-- 
Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - http://www.eaton.com/mgeops
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org/
Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/