[Nut-upsdev] cross-compiling the windows_port branch (socklen_t)

[Arjen de Korte]

Citeren Tim Rice <tim op multitalents.net>:

> There is at least one currently shipping UNIX platform where socklen_t is
> not defined. Please keep the NUT_TYPE_SOCKLEN_T test.

Which one? Is this system POSIX compliant (and do we fail to provide  
the proper flags to make it behave like one?)

> Nut's m4/nut_type_socklen_t.m4 could be enhanced with the recent changes
> to gnulib's m4/socklen.m4

I'm not sure this is a good idea. We require POSIX compliance and as  
far as I know, socklen_t should be defined.

Best regards, Arjen
-- 
Please keep list traffic on the list (off-list replies will be rejected)