[Nut-upsdev] NUT Bugs #313634 & #313714: unification & encapsulation of timer proposition
VaclavKrpec at Eaton.com
VaclavKrpec at Eaton.com
Tue Oct 9 15:14:23 UTC 2012
Hi Charles,
> I don't think we should ignore an EINVAL error, and we should fall back to
> gettimeofday() in that case. (I know gettimeofday is deprecated, but if
> CLOCK_MONOTONIC isn't quite right, then gettimeofday should work.)
Aw, I think I might have been too fast with condemning gettimeofday, before.
I've actually found one point at the code where we might need it
if POSIX clock isn't available:
in drivers/bcmxcp_usb.c::get_answer function, usb_interrupt_read
function's last argument appears to be required with ms precision.
If we don't have POSIX clock in this case, the time_t fallback will
decrease the timeout precision. It is questionable, however, whether
this is indeed so important (other drivers typically use hard 1s timeout
on usb_interrupt_read).
This should be discussed, I think.
The other usages may be easily replaced by both POSIX clock or time_t, IMO.
Regards,
vasek
-----------------------------
Eaton Elektrotechnika s.r.o. ~ S�dlo spolecnosti, jak je zaps�no v rejstr�ku: Kom�rovsk� 2406, Praha 9 - Horn� Pocernice, 193 00, Cesk� Republika ~ Jm�no, m�sto, kde byla spolecnost zaregistrov�na: Praha ~ Identifikacn� c�slo (ICO): 498 11 894
-----------------------------
More information about the Nut-upsdev
mailing list