[Nut-upsdev] apc / ap9612th questions

[Michal Soltys]

If you have a chance, could you check apcsmart branch from 
git://github.com/networkupstools/nut.git - and see if it behaves properly ?

It should work as explained in:

https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/commit/d40be56db79ee1627b71f5e1fc1f431052f3f403


On 2012-12-19 23:43, Michal Soltys wrote:
> On 2012-12-19 23:15, Arnaud Quette wrote:
>>
>> 2012/12/5 Steffen Plotner <swplotner at amherst.edu
>> <mailto:swplotner at amherst.edu>>
>>
>>     Hi,
>>
>>
>> Hi Steffen and Michal
>>
>>     Finally found it - the UPS on my side is APC020 (internal reference)
>>
>>      > -----Original Message-----
>>      > From: Michal Soltys [mailto:soltys at ziu.info
>> <mailto:soltys at ziu.info>]
>>      > Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 4:22 AM
>>      > To: Steffen Plotner
>>      > Cc: nut-upsdev
>>      > Subject: apc / ap9612th questions
>>      >
>>      > Steffen - I have few questions regarding this ups/card combo.:
>>      >
>>      >
>>      > 1) How does the capability string looks like ? (^Z)
>>
>>     SM
>>
>> #uD43132135138129uM43229234239224uA43110112114108uI43253264271280lD43103100097106lM43177172168182lA43090092081085lI43196188208204e44200155090oI43230240220225oD13115oJ13100oM13208s441HMLLq44202050710p443020180300600k4410TLNr443000060180300E443336168ON
>>
>>     OFF
>>
>>      >
>>      > 2) How does the string of supported commands look like ? (a)
>>
>>
>> 3.!$%+?=#|.+-789>@ABCDEFGKLMNOPQRSUVWXYZ'abcefgjklmnopqrsuxyz~,1..+-HIJT[]ahitv{}
>>
>>
>>      >
>>      > 3) How do values for '[' ']' '{' '}' are enumerated when this
>> card is
>>      > present ? I can see two choices:
>>
>>     NO,NO
>>     NO,NO
>>     NO,NO
>>     NO,NO
>>
>>
>> thanks for the data Steffen!
>>
>> @Michal: have you been able to finally address this long run point.
>> I've quickly gone through your blast of commits (3802-3818) and have not
>> seen obvious evidence of this...
>
> Not pushed yet, it will be on top of the recent stuff. I have few minor
> things to adjust/prepare/test remaining.
>
> Info provided by Steffen (thanks !) actually makes the thing easier than
> what I initially expected - as {} and [] are not reported in
> capabilities, so I don't have to handle any "multivalue" caps.
>
>
>>
>> cheers,
>> Arno
>> --
>> NUT (Network UPS Tools) Project Leader - http://www.networkupstools.org
>> Debian Developer - http://www.debian.org
>> Free Software Developer - http://arnaud.quette.fr
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nut-upsdev mailing list
> Nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org
> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev
>