[Nut-upsdev] [Nut-upsuser] Upssched 100% CPU after updating Debian 12

Sam Varshavchik mrsam at courier-mta.com
Wed Jun 14 11:34:50 BST 2023


Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser writes:

> So... determining that FD is to be reaped proved hard. Internet lore suggests  
> fcntl() and poll() on the FD, but it just seems valid to them. The errno is  
> also usually not raised (once I saw a "111: Connection refused" though).
> So the best dumb idea so far is to bail out if we spent the whole loop (128  
> attempts) and only got zero-sized read replies and no errors.

It's been my experience, that the path of least resistance is:

1) The sockets are sets to be non-blocking
2) poll()
3) If poll() says the socket is readable, and read() returns <= 0, then the  
socket is dead. You get no error, and read() returns 0, if the socket had an  
orderly shutdown.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20230614/7eb96efb/attachment.sig>


More information about the Nut-upsdev mailing list