<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2005/10/10, Kirill Smelkov <<a href="mailto:kirr@mns.spb.ru">kirr@mns.spb.ru</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
9 Октябрь 2005 21:43, Peter Selinger написал:<br>> Kirill Smelkov wrote:<br>> > 2. new status: HB = High Battery<br>><br>> There should be no such status flag as "High Battery". NUT simply uses<br>
> the absence of "LB" to indicate this state.<br>Ok, maybe you are right.<br><br>Although in my ups there are 3 states:<br><br>LB -- low battery<br>HB -- high battery<br>?? -- normal battery (?? = NB)<br><br>
Maybe it is worth extending status semantic?</blockquote><div><br>
<br>
- we already have LB<br>
- normal battery is represented by the absence of LB/RB<br>
- HB should stand for OL+battery.charge=100 isn't it?!<br>
<br>
You should better add support for battery.charge. Your ups supports
battery.{current, temperature,...} so it really should support it, and
the status extension is not needed at all.<br>
<br>
Arnaud<br>
</div></div>