<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">2006/7/11, Arjen de Korte <<a href="mailto:email@example.com">firstname.lastname@example.org</a>>:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>> +22 = Gamatronic UPSs with alarm interface<br>> + [CP=RTS] [OL=CTS] [LB=\-DCD] [SD=DTR]<br>> +<br>> +22 = CyberPower SL seriess<br>> + [CP=RTS] [OL=CTS] [LB=\-CAR] [SD=DTR]<br>> +<br>> +
<br><br>This part of the patch is no good. While TIOCM_CAR is equivalent to<br>TIOCM_CD (at least in some implementations) CAR certainly isn't handled<br>the same as DCD by genericups. It won't be interpreted and as such will
<br>not be used, so we shouldn't list this in the manpage either. I think the<br>best solution would be to merge type 22 and type 23 (as per my previous<br>message).<br></blockquote></div><br>right, done on Testing, queued for trunk.
<br><br>I would be glad if someone (maybe you, Arjen) take over genericups maintainership, as I don't own such devices, nor MGE produces it. So my interest in this is very limited (apart from NUT general maintainership...)
<br><br clear="all">Arnaud<br>-- <br>Linux / Unix Expert - MGE UPS SYSTEMS - R&D Dpt<br>Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - <a href="http://www.networkupstools.org/">http://www.networkupstools.org/</a><br>Debian Developer -
<a href="http://people.debian.org/~aquette/">http://people.debian.org/~aquette/</a><br>OpenSource Developer - <a href="http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/">http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/</a>