<br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/12/16 Charles Lepple <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:clepple@gmail.com">clepple@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div style="word-wrap: break-word;"><div><div class="im"><div>On Dec 16, 2010, at 3:31 AM, Arnaud Quette wrote:</div><br><blockquote type="cite">Hey Charles,<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2010/12/16 Charles Lepple <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:clepple@gmail.com" target="_blank">clepple@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> <div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
The Buildbot has detected a new failure of Ubuntu-lucid-x86 on Network UPS Tools.<br> Full details are available at:<br> <a href="http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/builders/Ubuntu-lucid-x86/builds/78" target="_blank">http://buildbot.networkupstools.org/public/nut/builders/Ubuntu-lucid-x86/builds/78</a><br>
</blockquote> <br></div> If I understand this correctly, there are multiple copies of some of the man page names in the automake variables:<br> <br> /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 ../../../docs/man/nut.conf.5 ../../../docs/man/ups.conf.5 ../../../docs/man/upsd.conf.5 ../../../docs/man/upsd.users.5 ../../../docs/man/upsmon.conf.5 ../../../docs/man/upssched.conf.5 ../../../docs/man/nut.conf.5 ../../../docs/man/ups.conf.5 ../../../docs/man/upsd.conf.5 ../../../docs/man/upsd.users.5 ../../../docs/man/upsmon.conf.5 ../../../docs/man/upssched.conf.5 '/var/lib/buildbot/buildbot-slave-cayenne/Ubuntu-lucid-x86/build/nut-2.4.3-r2739/_inst/share/man/man5'<br>
<br> /usr/bin/install: will not overwrite just-created `/var/lib/buildbot/buildbot-slave-cayenne/Ubuntu-lucid-x86/build/nut-2.4.3-r2739/_inst/share/man/man5/nut.conf.5' with `../../../docs/man/nut.conf.5'<br> /usr/bin/install: will not overwrite just-created `/var/lib/buildbot/buildbot-slave-cayenne/Ubuntu-lucid-x86/build/nut-2.4.3-r2739/_inst/share/man/man5/ups.conf.5' with `../../../docs/man/ups.conf.5'<br>
/usr/bin/install: will not overwrite just-created `/var/lib/buildbot/buildbot-slave-cayenne/Ubuntu-lucid-x86/build/nut-2.4.3-r2739/_inst/share/man/man5/upsd.conf.5' with `../../../docs/man/upsd.conf.5'<br> /usr/bin/install: will not overwrite just-created `/var/lib/buildbot/buildbot-slave-cayenne/Ubuntu-lucid-x86/build/nut-2.4.3-r2739/_inst/share/man/man5/upsd.users.5' with `../../../docs/man/upsd.users.5'<br>
/usr/bin/install: will not overwrite just-created `/var/lib/buildbot/buildbot-slave-cayenne/Ubuntu-lucid-x86/build/nut-2.4.3-r2739/_inst/share/man/man5/upsmon.conf.5' with `../../../docs/man/upsmon.conf.5'<br> /usr/bin/install: will not overwrite just-created `/var/lib/buildbot/buildbot-slave-cayenne/Ubuntu-lucid-x86/build/nut-2.4.3-r2739/_inst/share/man/man5/upssched.conf.5' with `../../../docs/man/upssched.conf.5'<br>
</blockquote><div><br>damn, I've missed that one!<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"> Let me know if you are still working on this in your working copy, or if I should take a look at this over the weekend.<br>
<br> I haven't really looked at the failures when asciidoc is not installed.<font color="#888888"><br> </font></blockquote></div><br>well, that's an issue: buildbot slaves needs the actual 8.6.3 for make dist to work: manpages are now distributed, but since these are not versioned, they are rebuild at worst upon make dist...<br>
<br>otherwise, we get the failures we have with all the slaves (apart from Arjen's which should meet AsciiDoc requirements).<br>I'm very reluctant to version generated manpages, so our only option is to require AsciiDoc 8.6.3.<br>
<br>Another option would be to know exactly which AsciiDoc version is available, since building manpages doesn't require the very latest.<br></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>The Linux boxes and the OS X system all have AsciiDoc 8.6.3 in /usr/local or similar. They only differ in whether or not they have up-to-date dblatex packages (or things that dblatex depends on). I'll check on the FreeBSD box later.</div>
<div><br></div><div>The configure script should be gathering the version information. It might not be enabling things properly, though.</div></div></div></blockquote><div><br>are you sure that you have an actual 8.6.3, ie not the trunk that exposed asciidoc 8.6.3 and a2x 8.6.1?<br>
your ubuntu logs seems to show the latter:<br><br><pre><span class="stdout">checking for asciidoc... /usr/local/bin/asciidoc<br>checking for asciiDoc version... 8.6.3 found<br>checking for a2x... /usr/local/bin/a2x<br>checking for a2x version... 8.6.1 found<br>
checking for dblatex... /usr/bin/dblatex<br>checking for dblatex version... 0.2.6-1 found<br>checking if asciidoc version can build html-single... yes<br>checking if a2x version can build html-chunked... no<br>checking if dblatex version can build pdf... yes<br>
checking if asciidoc version can build website (minimum required 8.6.3)... yes<br>checking if a2x version can build website (minimum required 8.6.3)... no<br>checking whether to build and install documentation... yes<br><br>
</span></pre></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div style="word-wrap: break-word;"><div><div class="im"><blockquote type="cite">
I would be very grateful if you can also have a look at the above (overwrite) on your side.<br> I'll get back on the macros to finally fix docs linking.<br></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>OK, I'll add it to my todo list.</div>
</div></div></blockquote><div> <br>thanks :)<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div style="word-wrap: break-word;"><div>
<div class="im"><blockquote type="cite">BTW, any plan to update AsciiDoc on your systems?<br></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div>Past 8.6.3? Not at the moment, but I don't see why not. I'd prefer to stick to point releases, though.</div>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>no, linked to my above remark (actual 8.6.3 Vs trunk pre 8.6.3...)<br><br>cheers,<br>Arnaud<br clear="all"><br>