[Nut-upsuser] Nut 2.2.0 also broke Belkin 1200 Universal UPS'

[Peter Selinger]

Arjen de Korte wrote:
> 
> 
> >> > Bus 003 Device 002: ID 050d:1100 Belkin Components
> >> >
> >> > # /lib/nut/usbhid-ups -a belkin
> >> > Network UPS Tools: 0.28 USB communication driver 0.28 - core 0.30
> >> (2.2.0-)
> >> >
> >> > No matching HID UPS found
> >> >
> >> > Hmm best to stick with 2.0.4.
> >>
> >> No. Just run the driver in debug mode and you'll see what you have to do
> >> to start it again.
> > Perhaps we should lower the debug level of that particular set of
> > error messages to 0?
> 
> No, here the message should be send via fatalx or fatal_with_errno. The
> upsdebugx and upsdebug_with_errno should remain reserved for debugging,
> with levels > 0. I agree that drivers should be as verbose as possible if
> it finds it can't connect.

Yes, but it's not a fatal error, because the user could have more than
one UPS. You wouldn't want the driver to quit simply because the first
UPS it found was unsupported. 
 
> > It seems to be useful even when not debugging.
> 
> Other useful information should be logged via upslogx and
> upslog_with_errno, which will also go to the console when we're not
> backgrounded yet.

Ah, yes! So this is what we should use for the above message, I
think. -- Peter