[Nut-upsuser] LibUSB-1.0+0.1 testing wanted, NUT 2.7.5 pending
jimklimov at gmail.com
Tue Dec 28 08:16:20 GMT 2021
Small notice: people willing to test have suddenly got a couple more days
before I merge these libusb* branches and other large pending PRs.
FossHost (who provide VMs for the NUT CI farm) are currently migrating them
to another datacenter by 29th evening, and we'd be changing networking
setup along the way, so to avoid loss of build history I'd rather avoid
main-branch changes for a few days.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021, 21:42 Jim Klimov <jimklimov+nut at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello fellow NUTs :)
> It seems the magic of the season might just help us finish some long
> story arcs and tie up loose ends... oh, wait, that is wording about other
> "seasons" ;)
> In our case, the "fightwarn" effort is reaching a major milestone to
> finally pass the builds with "medium" level of warnings treated as fatal
> errors - with zero warnings. This achievement took a bit over a year, and
> almost 3000 commits to analyze and stomp out different small bugs, and it
> allows to set that tolerance level as default and insist on non-regressions
> with future iterations - as well as to work towards clearing the "hard"
> level eventually. And this became one of the criteria for cutting a new
> official NUT release (especially as new platforms refused to build release
> 2.7.4 with their default settings).
> This work has originally delayed merging of libusb-1.0 support (from
> issue https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/300 and several
> candidate branches to pick from), in particular because with the original
> codebase sporting thousands of build warnings, it was hard to notice any
> new "offences" introduced by this large set of changes. I was afraid that
> merging it would even have to wait until after the next NUT release, but in
> the end found that some remaining warnings in the original USB-related NUT
> codebase made those branches' changes the better solution.
> Now, before we find the hard way if the cure is worse than the disease,
> I would like to ask people with USB-connected UPSes (and also those using
> the MGE SHUT protocol) to build and test
> branch with their setups - hopefully hitting as many OSes and CPU types as
> feasible, as well as trying both libusb-0.1, libusb-1.0 (and not sure about
> For building from scratch, note we now have a list of prerequisite
> packages for several platforms at
> - and as for other code, PRs there are welcome too.
> Note also the new `ci_build.sh` script to automate a number of
> configurations and setups, usually reducing the typing needed to reproduce
> build attempts :)
> I understand that some people would be away for holidays, but also
> realize that for others these days may be among the few times in the year
> that can be dedicated to such experiments and other hobbies. It would be
> much appreciated if you can help bring the official new confident NUT
> release date closer ;)
> The NUT CI farm is busy testing hundreds of build combinations formally
> in software, but it is no replacement for tests against actual hardware.
> Also, great thanks to dozens of individual and corporate contributors
> adding and fixing NUT drivers and other features (a few are still being
> tested and may become part of the new release too), and sharing findings
> and ideas in the issue tracker -- you guys and gals are our real heroes!
> Finally, on behalf of the NUT core team, please let me wish you all a
> happy holiday season and some quality time to rest, walk, ski and be with
> family and friends!
> Jim Klimov
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Nut-upsuser