[Nut-upsuser] I-D progress update - ISE comments - NETVER vs PROTVER
roger at rogerprice.org
Tue Apr 19 10:56:33 BST 2022
On Tue, 19 Apr 2022, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 19.04.22 08:56, Roger Price wrote:
>> The problem: the I-D uses PROTVER rather than NETVER, however 2.8.0 only
>> supports NETVER.
>> The argument in favour of PROTVER is that the command is not asking for the
>> version of the _network_. It is asking for the version of the _protocol_.
>> The argument in favour of NETVER is that it is currrently implemented in
>> Should the I-D revert to NETVER? I will follow whatever the list decides.
> can NETVER be declared as obsolete alternative to PROTVER?
If PROTVER was also implemented, then yes, but if PROTVER is not implemented,
then there would be a divergence between the I-D and NUT 2.8.0, which I want to
More information about the Nut-upsuser