[Nut-upsuser] Keeping the traffis on or off the list ?

[Jim Klimov]

I sometimes get replies that are directed only to me.

Oftentimes it is a sender "error" to not have used Reply to All, so I
direct my response back to the list. Rarely it is about something the
senders deem confidential, where a pointed reply seems to make sense
(overriding would be bad).

Other than that, I think the mailing list service we get from alioth comes
"as is", not sure we can configure much about it. Can check, but not really
inclined to - let humans decide how to best post and what is correct for
each case :)

Jim


On Sat, Feb 17, 2024 at 9:32 AM Roger Price via Nut-upsuser <
nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote:

> I recently wrote to the list.  The distributed message had the following
> headers:
>
> > Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:22:59 +0100 (CET)
> > From: Roger Price via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net>
> > Reply-To: Roger Price <roger at rogerprice.org>
> > To: nut-upsuser Mailing List <nut-upsuser at lists.alioth.debian.org>
> > Subject: ...
>
> Note that the Reply-To goes back to the original poster, not the list.
> Many mailing lists encourage the subscribers to "keep the list traffic on
> the
> list", rather than wandering off into private discussions.  The
> nut-upsuser
> setup has exactly the opposite effect.
>
> Is it the intention to send the subscibers into private conversation?  If
> not,
> and I suspect not, then the current Reply-To looks like a bug.
>
> Any replies to the list please.  Roger
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nut-upsuser mailing list
> Nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsuser
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20240217/528b5d90/attachment.htm>