<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/7/8 Richard Scobie <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:richard@sauce.co.nz">richard@sauce.co.nz</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">Arnaud Quette wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
I'm not an apc knowlee (and really don't want to become, really!), but it may have something to do with the smart more detection (sending 'Y' or ESC then 'Y' it seems).<br>
<br>
have you seen anything with your hyperterm?<br>
you will possibly have to dig a bit to get more info.<br>
<br>
btw, I've found that:<br>
<a href="http://www.nabble.com/APC-Cable-940-1525-td20503786.html" target="_blank">http://www.nabble.com/APC-Cable-940-1525-td20503786.html</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
This link above is the key I think - this is exactly the UPS I have and judging from the the comment "new SmartUPS units that use a new proprietary undocumented protocol" and "however APC has refused to provide any protocol details", things do not look good.<br>
<br>
I would be very happy to do what I can to provide more details, but this UPS is in active service, so testing would have to be sporadic.<br>
<br>
Back to the APC software I guess...<br>
</blockquote><div><br>you can still ask apc support to disclose info and cooperate with NUT!<br>or exchange your unit for a NUT friendly (my guess... hem, Eaton for sure ;-)<br>about the test, I've no clue apart from ESC + try every letter and check the result.<br>
<br>Arnaud<br></div></div>