<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2012/4/11 Robert Ayrapetyan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:robert.ayrapetyan@gmail.com">robert.ayrapetyan@gmail.com</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Seems I've missed confirmation mail somewhere, now registered.<div class="im"><br>
<br>
> have you patched your 2.6.1 or used trunk + the patch?<br></div>
I've used trunk + the patch.<div class="im"><br>
<br>
> I'd be interested in a trace without the patch, to<br>
> see if we're still on the overflow side.<br>
<br></div>
trunk (rev.3529) "with no patch" log attached.<br>
<br>
Btw I've checked all logs I've sent so far - all of them contain:<br>
<br>
1.199490 libusb_get_report: Unknown error<br>
1.199512 Can't retrieve Report 0c: Input/output error<br>
<br>
Seems you are talking about Dmitry's case (overflow).<br></blockquote><div><br>you're right: your issues are the same, but BSD doesn't report EOVERFLOW has it should.<br>while Dmitry is running on Linux, the patch should work there.<br>
<br>@Robert: could you please run the test again (with wathever version), using debug level 5 (-DDDDD) and doing "export USB_DEBUG=3" before launching the driver?<br><br>if there is no way to catch overflow on BSD, I fear I'll have to create a driver option to bypass this...<br>
<br>cheers,<br>Arno<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
<br>
On 04/11/12 16:35, Arnaud Quette wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
2012/4/11 Robert Ayrapetyan <<a href="mailto:robert.ayrapetyan@gmail.com" target="_blank">robert.ayrapetyan@gmail.com</a><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:robert.ayrapetyan@gmail.com" target="_blank">robert.ayrapetyan@<u></u>gmail.com</a>>><div class="im"><br>
<br>
Hi.<br>
<br>
<br>
Hi Robert,<br>
<br>
please check your subscription.<br>
I'm still told that you're not subscribed!<br>
<br>
Mine output after patch looks same (attached).<br>
<br>
<br>
in fact, it's different.<br>
It's no more an overflow error, but an I/O error!<br>
<br>
have you patched your 2.6.1 or used trunk + the patch?<br>
in the latter case, I'd be interested in a trace without the patch, to<br>
see if we're still on the overflow side.<br>
<br>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Arnaud Quette<br></div><div class="im">
<<a href="mailto:aquette.dev@gmail.com" target="_blank">aquette.dev@gmail.com</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:aquette.dev@gmail.com" target="_blank">aquette.dev@gmail.com</a>><u></u>> wrote:<br>
> Hi Robert and Dmitry,<br>
><br>
> I'm crossing LP with the nut mailing list, since this is the same<br>
EOVERFLOW<br>
> issue.<br>
><br>
> @Dmitry: it comes out that my previous patch was missing the<br>
libusb.c part<br>
> :-/<br>
><br>
> to both, the attached patch should fix your issue.<br>
> please send compressed debug output to confirm the fix.<br>
><br>
> I'll have to do some more testing tomorrow since it's "blind<br>
coded" (Ie,<br>
> just compiled, not tested with HW)<br>
><br>
> cheers,<br>
> Arnaud<br>
<br>
<br>
cheers,<br>
Arnaud<br>
--<br>
Linux / Unix Expert R&D - Eaton - <a href="http://powerquality.eaton.com" target="_blank">http://powerquality.eaton.com</a><br>
Network UPS Tools (NUT) Project Leader - <a href="http://www.networkupstools.org/" target="_blank">http://www.networkupstools.<u></u>org/</a><br>
Debian Developer - <a href="http://www.debian.org" target="_blank">http://www.debian.org</a><br>
Free Software Developer - <a href="http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/" target="_blank">http://arnaud.quette.free.fr/</a><br>
<br>
</div></blockquote>
</blockquote></div><br><br>