Offlineimap is dead, long live offlineimap?
Dan Poirier
poirier at pobox.com
Thu May 20 13:25:10 BST 2010
On 2010-05-20 at 01:09, Nicolas Sebrecht <nicolas.s-dev at laposte.net> wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 12:02:03PM +0200, Christoph Höger wrote:
>>
>> 2. Should we move on to another (compiled) language to make maintenance
>> easier?
>
> About rewriting, I think it could be nice to look further at language.
>
> What about Ruby or Go?
My feeling is if someone wants to write an IMAP sync tool in another
language, that's fine, but that's not an update to offlineimap, it's a
new project.
More information about the OfflineIMAP-project
mailing list